Recently in in_class Category

Bring annotated texts (2-3 poems, OR 300-500 words from a prose passage) that explain and support your interpretation.

This is advance work for Ex 5, due Nov 15.

In small groups, we will read aloud from the readings, and practice recording our voices.

We will do a peer-review exercise in class.

Assessing the Quality of Sources

Bring your Paper 1 draft -- whatever its current state -- so that we can work on it in class.

Respond to a literary argument.

Come to class ready to work on your thesis and presubmission for Paper 1.

Paper 1 is a 3-4 page paper literary close reading, formatted in MLA Style -- the same thing as the paragraphs we've been working on so far, only more in-depth.

Keep your focus narrow. Avoid extreme terms like "best" or "never" or "all." You don't have to prove that Chillingworth is the worst villain ever written; you can just claim that "Because Chillingworth's cold villainy contrasts with the warmer, more passionate flaws of Hester and Dimmesdale, [your claim goes here]."

Things to bear in mind:

• If you do compare more than one work, integrate your discussion of both works. That is,
  
• Rather than write two short mini-papers (such as, for example, one on The Scarlet Letter and one on Bartleby, the Scrivener)...
• ...write about themes that appear in both works (such as a moral viewpoint, the depiction of isolation, and the function of the prison).
  
• Your best idea might not be your first. (This means you may need to cut the first few paragraphs, or even the first few pages, to make room to do justice to the best ideas, that may only occur to you after you've spent some time -- and maybe a few hundred words -- working a problem out).
• A workshop is a time to take risks, to be bold, to stretch yourself -- but be sure you can support your claims with direct quotations from the text.