de Man, ''Semilogy and Rhetoric''

He's de Man!- rhetorical questions and sarcasm

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AngelaPalumbo/2009/04/hes_de_man.html

Do I See a Hint of Author Intent in this Poststructural Essay?
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/GretaCarroll/2009/04/do_i_see_a_hint_of_author_inte.html

Can you write me a persuasive story, please?

Are we working together?

Literature: Reliable or Unreliable?
“Literature as well as criticism—the difference between them being delusive—are condemned (or privileged) to be forever the most rigorous and, consequently, the most unreliable language in terms of which man names and modifies himself”(de Man 373).

"Semiology, as opposed to semantics, is the science or study of signs as signifiers; it does not ask what words mean, but how they mean" (de Man 366)

De Man is da man! yaya grammar!

An archie Debunker

Bin of Binaries
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JennaMiller/2009/04/bin-of-binaries.html

Foundations of literary constructs.
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/QuinnKerno/2009/04/semiology_and_r.html

"Yeats's poem is not explicitly 'about; rhetorical questions but about images or metaphors, and about the possibility of convergence between experiences of consciousness such as memory or emotions-what the poem calls passion, piety and affection-and entities accessible to the senses such as bodies, persons or icons." (de Man 369).

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/SueMyers/2009/04/we-take-it-for.html

Poor little literature we always it for granted