Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism''
In Keesey, Ch 6
Presenter: Tiffany Brattina
Categories: poststructuralism , readings
10 Comments
Leave a comment
Recent Comments
Mara Barreiro on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': your the nest contestant
Jenna on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Babies and Wright http://blogs.setonhill.edu/Jenna
Michelle Tantlinger on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Is Wright taking the easy way out?
Sue on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': "Post-structuralist criticism undermines the notio
Bethany Merryman on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Check this out!!!
Greta Carroll on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Why all this Ambiguity and Ambivalence? “The que
james lohr on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': "Reading a text is no longer considered an innocen
Derek Tickle on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Why is Language Associated with Babo
Erica Gearhart on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': From Elizabeth Wright’s “The New Psychoanalysis an
Angela Palumbo on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Breast Feeding http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AngelaP
Jenna on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Babies and Wright http://blogs.setonhill.edu/Jenna
Michelle Tantlinger on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Is Wright taking the easy way out?
Sue on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': "Post-structuralist criticism undermines the notio
Bethany Merryman on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Check this out!!!
Greta Carroll on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Why all this Ambiguity and Ambivalence? “The que
james lohr on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': "Reading a text is no longer considered an innocen
Derek Tickle on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Why is Language Associated with Babo
Erica Gearhart on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': From Elizabeth Wright’s “The New Psychoanalysis an
Angela Palumbo on Wright, ''The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism'': Breast Feeding http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AngelaP
Instructor
EL 312 Roster
Mara Barreiro
Bethany Bouchard
Greta Carroll
Kayley Dardano
Ellen Einsporn
Erica Gearhart
Quinn Kerno
James Lohr
Bethany Merryman
Jenna Miller
Sue Myers
Angela Palumbo
Jodi Schweizer
Corey Struss
Michelle Tantlinger
Derek Tickle
Katie Vann
Peer Blogging
Instructor
January
February
March
April
May
Breast Feeding
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AngelaPalumbo/2009/03/breast_feeding.html
From Elizabeth Wright’s “The New Psychoanalysis and Literary Criticism” in Donald Keesey’s Contexts for Criticism, page 396
“The uncanny force of the shaving scene resides in the slave’s actions being both signifier of his good intentions to Delano, the new master, and at the same time signifier of his bad ones to Cereno, his old master, whose death is the moment he anticipates.”
Why is Language Associated with Babo
"Reading a text is no longer considered an innocent activity. Post-structuralism undermines the notion that the text contains a stable meaning" (Wright 393).
Near the end of the essay we are given another quote, "...meanings of which [the author] had only a blurred view" (Wright 399).
Why all this Ambiguity and Ambivalence?
“The question naturally arises why we should bother ourselves about unstable meanings. What do we gain from proving that an author is ambivalent, and he did not know he meant it when he said it? It seems that on the one hand we are taking a share of the credit away from him, but on the other hand we are also giving him credit for an act of living communication. Instead of treating the author virtually as an egoist we are treating him as a subject whom we could enlighten. We do this not by gleefully uncovering hidden meanings of which he had only a blurred view, because no one can project perfectly and infinitely into the future” (Wright 399).
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/GretaCarroll/2009/03/why_all_this_ambiguity_and_amb.html
Check this out!!!
"Post-structuralist criticism undermines the notion that the text contains a stable meaning" (Wright 393).
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/SueMyers/
Is Wright taking the easy way out?
Babies and Wright
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JennaMiller/2009/03/babies-and-wright.html
your the nest contestant