A professor agrees to review a manuscript that is under consideration for publication at a journal. He has promised to keep the paper and its contents absolutely confidential. When he reads it, however, he realizes that his student’s experiments will never work; the paper shows that they are futile. Does he keep mum, or does he break the confidentiality rule and tell his student what he just learned? —Ethics 101: A Course About the Pitfalls (NYT (Registration; link will expire))
Another good suggestion from Jim.
Similar:
This is what the techbros are excited about? Really?
“Save the date for the 2024 eclipse,” the young teacher told his students back in 1978. De...
Crying Myself to Sleep on the Biggest Cruise Ship Ever
New infographic to help our graduating English majors make sense of their capstone project...
Double Entry Journals: Your Scholarly Research Notes for College-level Critical Thinking
The Assignment #StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch (Season 5, Episode 5) Keiko is not herself after a t...