Was It as Bad for You as It Was for Me?

It’s poor chemistry between writer and reader (pontificator and pontificatee, in the academic version), like lack of sizzle between jaded full professor and enthusiastic asst. prof. It’s failure of Interrogator A to make the noises and gestures that work for Hegemonized Reader B. It may be Defamiliarizer A’s clumsy attempt to shake up the ideological/emotional/instrumental reflexes of Overly Essentialized Reader B. It may be sheer incompetence at nouns, verbs, and adjectives. —Carlin RomanoWas It as Bad for You as It Was for Me? (Chronicle)

Another fine suggestion from Jim.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *