Engineering God in a Petri Dish

But how does one measure the godliness of bacteria versus a fruit fly? (Keats opted for flies in lieu of humans, which, he said, would require “a really big bell jar.”) After briefly considering omnipotence, Keats decided to measure omnipresence. Did the number of organisms increase? How fast? In the case of the fruit flies, Keats, who considers himself Jewish “by heritage,” found the Christian Kyrie prayer brought about increased and statistically significant reproduction compared to the control group.–Kari Lynn Dean

Engineering God in a Petri Dish  (Wired)

While the method is rather farcical, his philosophy is actually rather intriguing:

“Science rejects God for want of empirical evidence, and religion rejects the scientific method the moment it contradicts the Bible.

“I’m trying to explore whether faith and reason can peaceably coexist. I think they can. So this project is truly a thought experiment: By taking the assumptions of extremists on both ends of the spectrum, and combining them, I’m hoping we can sort out the implications.”

One thought on “Engineering God in a Petri Dish

  1. “Science rejects God for want of empirical evidence, and religion rejects the scientific method the moment it contradicts the Bible.”

    The problem is, I’ll bet it’s the same people making both statements, putting words in the mouths of “extremists on both ends”. Science doesn’t reject God. Religion doesn’t reject scientific method. Do the people who fund this “research” look at where their money is going?

    Behe and Dembski referenced as authorities worthy to quote! Wired has nothing on CBS ;)

Leave a Reply to Ron Zeno Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *