Movie critics are sometimes asked why all movies cost the same to view,
even though some may have cost $100 million to make, and others
$500,000. It’s a reasonable question. I suppose the reasoning is that
you get about two hours of movie either way. Now 3-D has provided
exhibitors with a subterfuge to force consumers to subsidise their
upgraded projection facilities — which is deceptive, because most
theatres are upgrading to digital projectors anyway. This could be
called the 3-D children’s tax.Do kids really care? —Roger Ebert, Spectator
Similar:
Journalist flexes in story about Trump Media accountant who has spelled his own name 14 di...
This is what the techbros are excited about? Really?
Crying Myself to Sleep on the Biggest Cruise Ship Ever
New infographic to help our graduating English majors make sense of their capstone project...
Pushing and pulling vertices. Components that fit together perfectly when I model them in ...
Just look at the light on this Mary Cassatt painting