Current_Events: February 2004 Archive Page

Below the Sinkhole You are about 75 feet into the cave. There is a dim light at the east of the passage. There is a methamphetamine lab here! >EXAMINE LAB Nothing extravagant -- about average for this area. You see some cookware, solvents, and acids. Looks like someone has just finished cooking. >_

--There is a methamphetamine lab here! (Bowling Green Daily News)

OK, for those who don't get it -- this news story about a meth lab found in a cave made me think of the classic game "Colossal Cave Adventure," which I'm researching in prepraration for a conference in a few weeks.

Two different things seem to have happened at the same place and time, according to the "spin" placed on two different reports from competing local papers.

Post-Gazette to seek wage concessions (Tribune-Review, reporting on its competition)
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is gushing red ink, prompting workers to vote today on wage and benefits concessions designed to save the newspaper from insolvency, union officials said Sunday during a special meeting.

Vote on contract adjustments by PG unions (Post-Gazette, reporting on itself)
Leaders of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's 1,100 unionized employees urged the workers yesterday to approve contract adjustments that would help the company avoid a projected loss of $6.5 million in 2004.A Tale of Two LeadsTrib-Review/Post-Gazette)

Thanks for the links, Jess T.

Interesting comparison of stories... the Post-Gazette competes with the Trib-Review, so according to the Trib it is "gushing red ink". The Post-Gazette, reporting on itself, emphasizes the sacrifices its union employees are willing to make.

Competition is good for the public, because it keeps journalists on their toes and makes them accountable for their little mistakes (I presume that the Post-Gazette, which calls its owners "Block Communications Inc" is probably right, and the Trib, which calls the company "Blade Communications Co." is probably wrong) and biases (such as the Post-Gazette's privileging of the union leaders' plea to the rank-and-file union members).

When I was an undergrad at U.Va., there were two competing daily student papers, the Cavalier Daily (or rather the "Cavalier Five-Day-A-Week-And-Weekly-During-The-Summer) and the University Journal (which was three days a week during my freshman year and gradually worked up to five). A few years after I graduated, I learned the UJ went under, which was really too bad. Reading someone else's version of the story you covered, or seeing the photo someone else took at the same event, is really a great learning experience, even if it is sometimes humbling.

I remember when I used to cover city council meetings and other dry stuff for a local radio station, if three things happened that night and I write radio stories on two of them, no matter what, the next day at noon, the local paper would be out on the stands, and the third thing -- the thing that I didn't cover -- would be in the headlines. Being a very green intern, I was convinced that my news sense was completely wrong -- until the wiser, saner folks at the radio station pointed out that the newspaper was trying to reach the very same audience that listened to our radio station on the way to work in the morning.

Oh, I should note that the city desk editor of the local paper was married to the news director of my radio station; they were extremely professional about their work, and would try to scoop each other all the time. Once I worked hard on a 20-year anniversary story (on the destruction caused by Hurricane Camille), and had produced a half dozen stories, one or two minutes long; they were scheduled to run, one per day, in the week leading up to the actual anniversary. The local paper published a beautiful, in-depth report the weekend before the anniversary, which pretty much exhausted everyone's interest in the subject. Each of my little jobbies looked pathetic and lame, limping along five or six days after everyone had already clipped out the paper's big spread and saved it in their scrapbooks.

Conference ConundrumsJerz's Literacy Weblog)

Hooray... I just heard that I got near-full funding for both Princeton videogame conference (where I'll be presenting a paper on Will Crowther's original "Adventure") and the San Antonio 4C-s (where my paper topic is "Forced Blogging: Students' Emotional Investment in their Academic Weblogs"). Because the 4C's is a long conference in an expensive city, I might not be able to afford to go to the whole thing, but I present early and there's that blasted "stay overnight on a Saturday and get a cheaper airfare," so I'm going to have to wrestle with this one a bit. I'm hoping to share a room with a former colleague from the University of Toronto, but he may have had to book already... we'll see what happens. I've got the next six hours of my day booked absolutely solid...

Rosemary Frezza, Blog Angel (Jerz's Literacy Weblog)

I've blogged about trolls, but I've also been thinking about the beings that I call blog angels -- those helpful, friendly folks who may or may not have blogs of their own, but who regularly e-mail suggestions or leave them in comments, who privately warn me about typos or broken links, and without whom blogging would be much less fun. Rosemary Frezza e-mails me at least once a day with a list of typos and broken links -- not just on my weblog, but on other pages on my site as well. I love her dearly -- I've known her all my life, because she's my sister.

Happy birthday, Rosemary!

Today being Groundhog Day in U.S. (and elsewhere?) reminds me how the movie Groundhog Day suggests a model for how interactive stories could work. However, rather than write up my own essay on the topic, I'll link to others who have already discussed this, found via Google... --Andrew Stern --Groundhog Day and IF (again) (Grand Text Auto)

It has been said that reality is all about perspective -- a camera is a pinhole view of the world that frequently filters out much of the story. With that in mind, check out this video of the familiar "I have a scream" speech by Dean. I'm no Dean supporter, but from down in the trenches it doesn't look nearly as bad as it played on TV. Obviously the video you've seen on the news has the best part and the audience noise turned down, but from this vantage point, the speech almost seems appropriate for the crowd and the moment (but was still a lapse in judgement to forget cameras were rolling). --Mathowie --MeFi's take on 'I Have a Scream' (Metafilter)

I'm at home and haven't bothered to check the video over my slow telephone connection, but since I've blogged about Dean's speech before, I thought this alternate view was worthwhile.