History: February 2004 Archive Page

[O]n Feb. 20, 1954 -- President Dwight Eisenhower interrupted his vacation in Palm Springs, Calif., to make a secret nocturnal trip to a nearby Air Force base to meet two extraterrestrial aliens.

Or maybe not. Maybe Ike just went to the dentist. There's some dispute about this. --Peter Carlson --Ike and the alien ambassadors (M$ NBC)

A precious quote, from the author of a book on the political implications of an extraterrestrial presence on Earth: "There's a lot of stuff on the Internet," he says, "and I just went around and pieced it together."

Journalists aren't supposed to editorialize while covering the news, but the use of this quote pretty much says all that one needs to know.

A close second is the following:

Mixson's article "A History of Dwight D. Eisenhower's Oral Health" -- published in the November 1995 issue of the Bulletin of the History of Dentistry -- is the definitive work on Ike's teeth. [Some tooth-related info here.] That may be more than you wanted to know about Ike's dental work. If not, Mixson goes on at some length, quoting a long, lyrical passage written by Fairchild on this troublesome presidential incisor.

Leadholder can be broadly defined as any durable instrument that is designed to hold and be refillable with consumable pieces of graphite so that the graphite can be conveniently used for drawing or writing. Within this definition there are subsets such as porte-crayons, mechanical pencils, and drafting leadholders. This website is primarily concerned with drafting leadholders, which are commonly called by draftsmen in the US as simply leadholders. (From "What is a Leadholder?") --The Drafting Pencil Museum (Leadholder.com)

Okay, maybe I'm not quite that geeky, but I still enjoyed the site.

[O]bjective achievements in the arts are demonstrable?and if they can be historically established for the arts, then they are even more clearly identifiable for the sciences. These two spheres of human endeavor represent two kinds of potential objectivity: there is as little chance of the human race giving up Homer or the Beethoven symphonies as there is that it will give up the notion that the earth is a sphere. Over time, achievement in the arts and the sciences is seen as not merely an invention of scholarship, a product of fickle fashion, or a general social construction....The fundamental principle of human achievement is expressed by Aristotle in the Nichomachean Ethics and accepted by philosophers since, and more recently even by psychologists: that human beings derive pleasure from the just exercise of their skills and capacities. From crossword puzzles and rock climbing to painting, composing music, playing a musical instrument, or solving equations, Murray says, ?The pursuit of excellence is as natural as the pursuit of happiness.? For the creative geniuses who are the subject of his book, I prefer to say that achieved excellence simply is happiness. --Dennis Dutton reviews Charles Murray's Human Accomplishment --Of Human Accomplishment (New Criterion)

Hmm... achievement for achievement's sake is dangerously close to "art for art's sake". I suppose Murray at some point had to define what he means by "excellence". To excel in cruelty or to escape punishment for a crime is a kind of excellence; I suppose some people might excel at doing nothing. But that's probably straying too far from the book's subject area (which is, after all, about accomplishment, not destruction or avoidance).

Okay... a quick glance at the article reveals that Murray specifies "Transcendental goods" as one of the four qualities for human accomplishment, so that neatly handles my objection. As Dutton puts it, "These values are the true, the good, and the beautiful—the first central to science, the last to art, and the second to both science and art."

Ancient catapults were state-of-the-art weapons of unequalled power?but how powerful were the military engineers who created them?... The fearsome machines terrorized battlefields and sieges until the proliferation of gunpowder. Their power was impressive and terrifying. Roman catapults could hurl 60-pound (27-kilogram) boulders some 500 feet (150 meters). Archimedes' machines were said to have been able to throw stones three times as heavy. --Brian Handwerk --Catapult Makers: Rock Stars of Antiquity (National Geographic News)