Language: April 2008 Archive Page

Jason Scott (who has produced a documentary on BBS culture and is working on one now on interactive fiction) offers a thoughtful analysis of an Atari forum thread that went awry.

The problem with a "what do you think about this", or the hardest portion, is listening to what people say and then waiting until it's all died down to give a summary thanks and move on. Fulop instead begins a conversation and ultimately a quasi-interview/roundtable masquerading as a poll.

A web-based forum (in this case, AtariAge) is no longer imbued with the limitations of bulletin board systems; multiple simultaneous posters are a breeze, images can be embedded into discussions, and the software allows for instantaneous restructuring of the postings to satisfy a linear or threaded regard. While in many ways this is a positive set of innovations, it also brings along with it potential for flamewars and flare-ups to immediately consume the parties involved. There is no waiting period. There is an abundance of meta-discussion due to the non-scarce resource of access. There is a lower barrier to entry with commercial and societal interests in lowering the barrier even further. This is the modern environment and it's the way it is.

So saying that there were an average of 4.4 posts an hour is not all that helpful, in fact; you have no idea of the distribution of the messages. Since people can be writing multiple additions simultaneously, the forum can actually "breathe" in a manner not unlike a bellows or chamber in an engine; with posts queuing up in great numbers and blasting across the message base in waves.

My Intro to Literary Study students read Lynn Truss's Eats, Shoots and Leaves while I was away at a conference for most of last week. They really seem to enjoy this book. Early on this term, I noticed a critical mass of students who try to make their blog a place to practice writing for a real audience, rather than simply a place to "do their homework."  I'm also seeing a lot of deliberately playful use of language, dancing around and sometimes pushing beyond the boundaries of academic writing.

I can't even believe how interesting a book on punctuation can be. I'm learning - AND HAVING FUN TOO! Look at that, I'm having so much fun that I caps-locked. --Jessie

Alright here it goes... I, STEPAHNIE MARIE WYTOVICH, ADMIT TO LIKING THIS BOOK. Gah.  Ok I guess I feel a little better now.  -- Stephanie

I won't deny it, I'm afraid of the exclamation mark.  I have been going to therapy and I've made improvements, but I'm still a little!-phobic.  Exclamation marks are so strong! -- Erica

I have to say I like ellipsis because, the other reason they are used is to trail off in an intriguing manner.... -- Tiffany

I use italics way too much. -- Lauren

I'm not a student.  I found your web page while looking for a certain use of slashes.  I thought maybe you might know something about it.

In the legal field, we sometimes use slashes to indicate that there is nothing following the text when there is extra space at the end of a page.  An example would be when a heading falls at the bottom of the page in a brief.  You put in a hard page break to put the heading at the top of the next page, but that leaves a rather large area at the bottom that you don't want some unscrupulous individual to fill with a paragraph that you did not write.  It has been common practice to use centered, spaced slashes indicating the text has stopped on this page and will resume on the next page.

My question is, is there a standard as to how many slashes are used and how far apart they should be spaced?  And, if there is a rather large empty space, should you place a second set a little further down?

/    /    /    /    /

I asked for permission to post this question here.  In the The Aspen Handbook for Legal Writers, a section on slashes does not mention the use described here.

I'm no legal expert, but my legal researcher (a bright 12-year-old named G. Oogle) reveals a case that "held that a virgule ('/'), when placed between two names, is unambiguous and specifically indicates the check is payable in the alternative."

It seems to me that the best thing to do would be to follow whatever conventions you observe in other published writing. If there is a specific rule, I'm not sure what it is or where to look.  Certainly there are plenty of legal blogs (blawgs) out there.

The Conference on College Composition and Communication is the big annual meeting of college writing instructors. One often encounters technical writing instructors, social scientists, ethnographers, and new media innovators (we had Larry Lessig give a featured address a few years ago), as well as traditional essayists and grammar mavens. It's the kind of place where someone can say, "That reminds me of Aristotle's five canons of rhetoric... inventio, dispositio, elocutio, actio, and... uh.. .what's the other one?"  and it's likely that the others will get the joke.

While walking around the city after the conference was over, I had a vision of a future 4Cs conference that made me giddy. I'll tell you about it in a little bit. First, let me talk about the conference.