Diana crash witness speaks
Crucially, Mr Medjahdi said he could see no photographers anyway near the car, despite initial police suspicions that they might have distracted the driver. "I got a complete picture from my side and rear-view mirrors of what was happening beside me. There was no other vehicle in my field of vision. I saw no cars with the Mercedes, no photographers on motorbikes around the car. There was no one," he said. --Diana crash witness speaks (ThisIsLondon.com)I had occasionally caught myself wondering... if the princess's car were being pursued by paparazzi, where are the photos of the crash? Either they were lousy paparazzi, or the driver had already eluded them. How did the "pursued by paparazzi" meme get started, if the only eyewitness to the crash reports that there were none? It appears simply to be the opinion of Mohamed al-Fayed, father of Dodi Fayed, the princess's companion who was also killed in the crash:
Early eye-witness accounts broadcast on radio and television around the world portrayed a sickening scene in the Alma Tunnel, with paparazzi swarming around the wreck of the Mercedes, taking pictures moments after the crash, giving no thought to calling the emergency services and obstructing people who had come to give help to those inside the car.
A little googling shows me a news CNN report from 1999 that concludes, "there was no evidence they [photographers] were close to the car when the accident occurred, the report found". I confess I'm not that interested in royal politics, but I'm surprised that I didn't know about this alternate story, which isn't as powerful as the "pursued by photographers on motorbikes" meme.
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Recent Related Entries
Guarded Optimism for the Future of ReadingNaturally, as an English professor, I've got a vested interest in the future of reading. But you can't have an intellectually healthy society without literacy. I had a high school physics teacher -- Admiral Peebles (a retired nuclear submarine expert)...
Humanities Resource Center Online
The American Academy of Arts and Sciences has released a major study that aims to establish benchmarks for assessing the humanities. Assessment was one of the major issues that arose during last year's English program review, so this is worth...
Austenbook
Austenbook (Pride and Prejudice, as it would appear if all the characters interacted on Facebook.)...
The story of a literary hoax; or, how Elizabeth Pepys came to be quoted on "turds that do fly"
A wonderful post by Whitney Anne Trettien, who examines the reception of a feminist spoof of Pepys famous diary, in order to explore the strange human desire to trust those who reveal shameful private failures. (That is, unless her whole...
Deep Throat Meets Data Mining
Journalism is changing. Watchdog journalism -- the perusal of thousands of pages of official records in search of anomalies and other signs of abuse and corruption -- is much harder to do than reporting on celebrity shenanigans or fashion trends....
Something about this is sticking in my head. I think there were photos taken *immediately* after the crash, but that the French (Brits, too?) squashed them, prosecuting the paparazzi that took them for not assisting at the scene of an accident.
You might look around for that; seems odd they might have been close enough for those photos.
Right, I remember the fuss about the photographers who arrived right after the crash, and who were accused not only of not helping, but of interfering with medical crews. But there's a gap between eyewitness accounts of "paparazzi swarming around the wreck" and the claim that it was paparazzi who caused the crash.