Bushisms and Media-isms

President Bush made a simple but unfortunate mis-statment on Thursday that will haunt him in the press and on late-night T.V. talk shows for weeks to come. But what he said is not near as amazing as the blatant twists put on it by big news media to make it even more direct and daunting than it was.

Here's what he is quoted as saying:
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." (as quoted by Reuters in Yahoo! News)
His apparent intent was to allude to our country's own innovativeness and resourcefulness, but he confused the referents of the second statement with the subject of the first. -- Rob Stewart
--Bushisms and Media-isms (Snippets: Rob Stweart's Blog)
Yes, that's an awkward claim. As Rob suggests, this will be added to the collection of amusing Bush mis-statements. But if Bush's opponents sieze on this statement to insist that "thinking of new ways to harm our country" is the same thing as "Bush wants to harm our country in new ways," then our political discourse has descended to the level of grammar flaming. I hope that won't happen.

I remember in the fifth grade a student gave a speech where she claimed she "believed in freedom and in justice for all." That was a gaffe, and my friend Ron and I laughed about it to ourselves (after her speech was over) but I never for a moment thought she really believed in "injustice for all".

Although Bush's statement was awkward, I don't think it was a grammatical mistake. Hijacking passenger liners and using them as piloted bombs was indeed innovative and resourceful. Regardless of who is in power in the White House, if anti-terrorism forces don't spend a lot of time and energy thinking about other creative ways of being destructive, we will be defenseless. Thus, we must think of new ways to harm the US, so that we can protect the US.

Still, "and we never stop thinking of ways to protect ourselves," would have been much better.

Boston.com buries the "neither do we" comment at the bottom of an article praising Bush's recent attempts at impromptu humor -- though he made the terrorism gaffe in a prepared speech.

Leave a comment

Recent Related Entries

Guarded Optimism for the Future of Reading
Naturally, as an English professor, I've got a vested interest in the future of reading. But you can't have an intellectually healthy society without literacy. I had a high school physics teacher -- Admiral Peebles (a retired nuclear submarine expert)...

Humanities Resource Center Online
The American Academy of Arts and Sciences has released a major study that aims to establish benchmarks for assessing the humanities. Assessment was one of the major issues that arose during last year's English program review, so this is worth...

Austenbook
Austenbook (Pride and Prejudice, as it would appear if all the characters interacted on Facebook.)...

The story of a literary hoax; or, how Elizabeth Pepys came to be quoted on "turds that do fly"
A wonderful post by Whitney Anne Trettien, who examines the reception of a feminist spoof of Pepys famous diary, in order to explore the strange human desire to trust those who reveal shameful private failures. (That is, unless her whole...

Deep Throat Meets Data Mining
Journalism is changing. Watchdog journalism -- the perusal of thousands of pages of official records in search of anomalies and other signs of abuse and corruption -- is much harder to do than reporting on celebrity shenanigans or fashion trends....