The Ballad of Mike Edwards and the PDS

Mike Edwards had himself a pencil.
Weighed about forty pound.
Every time Mike Edwards drew a squiggly edit mark
Drove his pencil two inches in the ground,
Lawd, Lawd,
Drove his pencil two inches in the ground.

Mike Edwards's blog was named Vitia.
The logo looked the same upside down.
He'd sharpen up his pencil on both of its ends.
Called his pencil "Vitia" too, for the sound,
Lawd, Lawd.
Called his pencil "Vitia" too, for the sound.

Mike Edwards's Dean, Captain Tommy
Had a squared-away drive to succeed.
Loved Mike Edwards like his only blessed son.
Said, "I'll get you any funding that you need,"
Lawd, Lawd.
Said "I'll get you any funding that you need."

PDS salesman said to Captain Tommy,
"I think your students might try to plagiarize.
Let me tell you 'bout a tool that'll help enforce the rule,
And catch those cheaters by surprise,
Lawd, lawd.
It'll catch those cheaters by surprise."

Mike Edwards said to Captain Tommy
"TurnItIn.com appropriates the value of student writing for the sake of its own profits, while at the same time criminalizing students for the very same practice.
I'd rather die with my pencil in my hand,
Lawd, Lawd.
Die with my pencil in my hand."

Mike Edwards sharpened up "Vitia."
The salesman logged himself in.
And he set two even stacks of papers on his desk.
Said, "The dean'll grant you tenure if you win,
Lawd, Lawd.
Dean'll grant you tenure if you win."
The Ballad of Mike Edwards and the PDS (Jerz's Literacy Weblog)

3 Comments

Mike said:

Do you know something I don't, Dennis?

No, just having a little fun. By the way, I think your latest blog on this topic is the best so far...

A while back, writing teachers were cheered by the arrival of a technological solution to the relentlessly proliferative scourge of spelling errors committed by the lazy and illiterate students populating their courses. Today, there’s a substantial body of empirical evidence pointing to the radical increase in homonym and wrong word errors in student writing following the rise in popularity of spelling checkers in word processing applications. So tell me: what kind of increase in ethical errors might we imagine seeing in student writing should we pass along to machines the apparently overly onerous task of actually paying attention to how our students write?

joanna said:

Catchy tune, Dennis, but a little hard to dance to. Or to sing that fifth stanza, lawd, lawd. But your cleverness helps drive home a point (or two, given the pencil), so I say cheers. Laud, Laud, yes I do.

Leave a comment

Recent Related Entries

Guarded Optimism for the Future of Reading
Naturally, as an English professor, I've got a vested interest in the future of reading. But you can't have an intellectually healthy society without literacy. I had a high school physics teacher -- Admiral Peebles (a retired nuclear submarine expert)...

Humanities Resource Center Online
The American Academy of Arts and Sciences has released a major study that aims to establish benchmarks for assessing the humanities. Assessment was one of the major issues that arose during last year's English program review, so this is worth...

Austenbook
Austenbook (Pride and Prejudice, as it would appear if all the characters interacted on Facebook.)...

The story of a literary hoax; or, how Elizabeth Pepys came to be quoted on "turds that do fly"
A wonderful post by Whitney Anne Trettien, who examines the reception of a feminist spoof of Pepys famous diary, in order to explore the strange human desire to trust those who reveal shameful private failures. (That is, unless her whole...

Deep Throat Meets Data Mining
Journalism is changing. Watchdog journalism -- the perusal of thousands of pages of official records in search of anomalies and other signs of abuse and corruption -- is much harder to do than reporting on celebrity shenanigans or fashion trends....