Buying Its Way Onto the Program?
The idea of paying for positive coverage at a scholarly conference is 0% original.
Inside Higher Ed reports on Turnitin.com's awkward efforts to get positive coverage at the 4Cs next year. (Via KairosNews, which links to blogger reactions.)
Inside Higher Ed reports on Turnitin.com's awkward efforts to get positive coverage at the 4Cs next year. (Via KairosNews, which links to blogger reactions.)
The issue of paying professors to attend the 4C's meeting is particularly sensitive because of the make-up of the association. Many of the people most knowledgeable about teaching composition are adjunct professors or full timers who are off the tenure track and who frequently don't have the same access as tenured professors to travel budgets and research support. As a result, there is arguably more discussion within the 4C's meeting than at some others about issues related to who can afford to attend and present. The conference has a fund to help those without travel budgets attend the meeting -- but applications for such support are not based on whether or not someone favors using Turnitin.com. Kent Williamson, executive director of the National Council of Teachers of English, of which the 4C's is part, said he had never before heard of a company offering to pay people whose papers on selected topics are accepted for the annual meeting. He stressed that Turnitin.com did not ask permission to involve itself with the conference in this way and that the payments it makes are "not in any way a 4C's initiative."I do use Turnitin.com. I can only think of one time when the service identified problems with a paper submitted by a student who wasn't already showing serious signs of trouble in other areas (such as excessive absences or not turning in the pre-writing). I've even had a false positive where a student who had posted her pre-writing on her blog was surprised to find Turnitin.com calling the resulting paper "unoriginal" when it found her blog and compared its contents against the submitted work. Of course I explained to the student I would never even think of taking action on a Turnitin.com report without first investigating thoroughly, but that student was still distressed.
1 Comments
Leave a comment
Recent Related Entries
Two-Year in HellInside Higher Ed goes to hell.Job Listing #666. University of Hell at Seventh Circle. Visiting Assistant Professor, two years (with possibility of converting to tenure-track position at culmination of two-year appointment). Beginning September 2009. Teaching load of forty-three courses per...
Collaborative Authorship Made Easy
A good overview of the issues relating to using Wikis in the classroom. From the NCTE Inbox Blog:The benefits for collaborative writing should be obvious. Wikis allow multiple authors to edit a text easily. While the video doesn't discuss it,...
Educational benefits of social networking sites... low-income students, contrary to recent studies, are in many ways just as technologically savvy as their counterparts
From a University of Minnestoa press release:"What we found was that students using social networking sites are actually practicing the kinds of 21st century skills we want them to develop to be successful today," said Christine Greenhow, a learning technologies...
Above the Law?
Inside Higher Ed:Student newspaper advisers are something of an endangered species these days. They often get caught in the middle when administrators and student journalists clash over content, and in more than a few cases on college campuses in recent...
Hypertext '08: Session 7: Applications of Hypertext
Chair: Ken Anderson (University of Colorado at Boulder, USA)Enhancing Access to Open Corpus Educational Content: Learning in the Wild (Long Paper) Seamus Lawless, Lucy Hederman and Vincent Wade Lack of relevant and accessible digital content hampers the implementation of e-learning....
I refuse to use TurnItIn and don't support it much. I don't recommend it to faculty that I work with and I won't use it when I teach.
There are many professors who use it punitively and not as a learning tool. In addition, the entire idea of a repository where original work is kept, without the students' direct consent (I don't think many students will speak out against *how* their work is turned in, especially when they don't know the logistics of the system), bothers me.