StupidFilter :: Main / FAQ

A project called StupidFilter is trying to weed out stupid internet comments. Hoax? At any rate, it's amusing.
Do you really expect to be able to detect and filter anything that's conceivably stupid?
No, of course not. You'd need real AI for that, and beyond a certain point it's simply subjective; after all, a sufficiently advanced AI would probably filter out the whole of human discourse, which isn't the idea.
So what do you plan to filter?
The idea is that the most egregiously stupid comments will also be the easiest to detect while remaining ignorant of context; comments with too much or too little capitalization, too many text-message abbreviations, excessive use of "LOL," exclamation points, and so on.
How do you rate stupidity?
Since we're trying to build a detailed database that serves as a very verbose example of What Not To Do, we look for comments whose prose style we can point to and say, "I don't even have to understand the content of this comment to know that it's stupid," -- based on the gross prose style alone, its stupidity is self-evident. It is then useful as an example for our parser to integrate into its database of stupidity.

2 Comments

Phill said:

So They are blocking freedom of speech now? and will probably make good money doing it too.. You know the thugs that got paid to sit in front of voting booths in the deep south that kept blacks from voting got paid pretty well too. Screw the constitution, this is F-ing America, Money and Power are more important than our founding father's out of date "ideas" on freedom. Good thing this thing is only in Beta mode.. it might filter posts like this someday.

I don't think putting a filter on a website is the same thing as blocking free speech -- even if the filter has arbitrary rules.

Any blogger could, if he or she wanted, delete all comments that have an odd number of words, or all comments that don't earn a certain number of reuptation points from the readers, or all comments that aren't written in iambic pentameter. Such a blogger would earn a reuptation of being closed-minded or obsessive, but it wouldn't be a Frist Amendment issue unless Congress were somehow involved.

If the entire internet enforced a StupidFilter, or somehow it affected anyone's right to vote, I'd agree it would be unethical.

Leave a comment

Recent Related Entries

The New Journalism: Goosing the Gray Lady
This past year has been catastrophic for the New York Times. Advertising dropped off a cliff. The stock sank by 60 percent, and by fall, the paper had been rated a junk investment, announced plans to mortgage its new building,...

New Media Venture Turns Bloggers Into Print Journalists
As old media races to catch up with the Web and figure out how to successfully monetize print content online, one publication is taking a drastically different approach: web to print.The Printed Blog, a startup founded and funded by former...

Bad Story, Great Game -- How Mediocrity Gooses 'Gears of War 2'
Some great writing and insightful observations in this review. The story's arc is like that of a football thrown lazily against a crisp autumn sky: Even a dog can figure out where it's going to land. Hell, I could accurately...

E-mail Fail
It seems that a recent 'reply-all storm' at the State Department caused the entire e-mail infrastructure to crash. A notice sent to all State Department employees warned of disciplinary actions which will be taken if users "reply-all" to lists with...

The Air Force's Rules of Engagement for Blogging [Updated]
GlobalNerdy, via.You've probably seen many articles on companies and organizations saying that they take social media seriously. Here's one such organization that you might not expect: the United States Air Force. Take a look at the Air Force Blog Assessment...