Feldstein, ''Reader, Text, and Ambiguous Referentiality in 'The Yellow Wallpaper'''

Hey Dr. Jerz--Can I have this presentation please? I don't think Vanessa will mind if I steal it from her ;-)

“It is safer, and far “sweeter,” to imagine what the “flowery tale” depicted on the urn might have said…” (389).

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AngelaPalumbo/2009/04/keats_could_control_himself.html

I knew that The Yellow Wallpaper was a story containing every critical view

The Pros and the Cons of Feldstein
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/GretaCarroll/2009/04/the_pros_and_the_cons_of_felds.html

what is madness

"Wallpaper," "Wall Paper," or "Wall-Paper": Uncertainty in Gilman's Story

"...John is the story's antagonist and the narrator/protagonist succumbs to a progressive form of madness" (Feldstein 402)

Talk about Multiple Meanings
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JennaMiller/2009/04/talk-about-multiple-meanings.html

Check out my blog!! See you for presentation tonight!

"If we read 'The Yellow Wall-paper ironically and not simply as a case history of one woman's mental derangement, the narrator's madness becomes questionable, and the question of madness itself, an issue raised as a means of problematizing such a reading." (Feldstein 403).

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/SueMyers/2009/04/wallpaper-wall-.html

"If Gilman had the advantage of our perspective, she might have been pleased by this confusion of textual identity" (Feldstein 402).