Havelock (98-126)

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DaniellaChoynowski/2008/02/it_would_take_an_awful_lot_of.html

"...human communication relies also on vision to the degree that bodily signals and responses are perceived by the eye." (Havelock. p.98)
Here is the link to my blog:
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JeremyBarrick/2008/02/el336_havelock_the_special_the.html

“As language became separated visually from the person who uttered it, so also the person, the source of the language, came into sharper focus and the concept of selfhood was born.”

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/KaylaSawyer/2008/02/havelock-98126.html

" Partnership between oral and written, acoustic and visual, ear and eye, still remains intimate, with the eye as yet a junior partner." (Havelock pg. 103)

" This had freed the composer to choose subjects for a discourse which were not necessarily agents, that is, persons" ( Havelock pg. 101).

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DavidCristello/2008/02/the_muse_learns_to_write_pt_3.html

"To suppose that after a million years ... reading could replace hearing, automatically and easily, without profound and artificial adjustments of the human organism, is to fly in the face of the evolutionary lesson. (Havelock, The Muse Learns to Write 100)"

Trackback: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ChristopherUlicne/024136.html

My glorious agenda item.

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/LeslieRodriguez/023202.html