When you think about it, the Times may have it backward. It charges $1 for the latest news in print, and offers it free over the Web, but for old material demands $3, which is three times the price of an entire newspaper. —Adam L. Penenberg —Searching for the New York Times (Wired)
The NY Times is a great paper, but you have to register to read articles, and they quickly dissapear into paid archives. So it’s not making a dent online. There are ways to get around it, but I haven’t found it worth the trouble. It’s also possible to get Salon articles for free (if you sit through a long commercial), but there’s plenty of other good stuff online that will be less annoying to read.
Similar:
A trend story about millennials, by The New York Times
“When it comes down to it, life is reall...
Amusing
For New Acquisitions, UMD Libraries Choose Ebooks by Default
Increasingly book vendors provide option...
Academia
The problem with blog comments, in 5 images.
After I read Mark Sample's blog post "Wh...
Academia
Twitter Cheat Sheet to Help Increase Engagement
-Brands see 17 percent more engagement d...
Business
Photo of William Crowther, 2012
I just noticed that a few days ago, a Wi...
Cyberculture
The magic of words opens a whole new world of fun
Emily Short’s work is always worth seeki...
Aesthetics



I love this. So true! Can’t believe I never thought of it this way. The $ is tied to the archive, not the breaking news…the past has become the treasure chest of the media, not the present.