In the latest attempt by the scientific community to offer algebraic explanations for the seemingly inexplicable, mathematicians have come up with a formula for the best kind of scary movie.
Using the equation (es + u + cs + t) squared + s + (tl + f) / 2 + (a + dr + fs) / n + sin x – 1, researchers have concluded that The Shining, the 1980 film starring a homicidal Jack Nicholson, is the ideal horror flick.
—Music + chase scenes = new formula for fear (Guardian)
Hmm… this project was commissioned by “Sky Movies,” a British which just happens to be holding a scary movie marathon this weekend.
My colleague Mike Arnzen reports he was interviewed by BBC News to respond to this finding. I didn’t know about it until it was over, though.
Similar:
1,000-pound rosary sends heavy message: Pray
The rosary that retired quarry worker Be...
Aesthetics
ChatGPT answers more than half of software engineering questions incorrectly
The results showed that out of the 512 q...
Business
The Chicago Tribune Has Made the Best Internet Mistake of the Day
Every second is a deadline, every instan...
Amusing
How Daydreams and Videogames Can Make Us Confident In Real Life (Yes)
Is there a daydreamer in your life? Ther...
Culture
Portofess
"If people can confess on Oprah, Phil an...
Ethics
Making Interactive Fiction Mainstream: Readers
Jon Ingold describes the gamelike storyt...
Aesthetics
The interview went well, but we never really spoke directly to the “formula” article, unfortunately. I think it’s a joke, ultimately, from Sky Movies…but it doesn’t really say a lot for my favorite genre. Maybe the films of recent notice have become formulaic, but a literary genre cannot be reduced to a formula, obviously. Especially in horror, it’s BREAKING the rules that make genre literature so exciting, even insomuch as they appear conventional in other ways. It’s commerce’s dream that there COULD be a bankable formula that’s responsible for wounding the arts in our culture. Wish I could have said something to that effect on the air…
— Mike A.
I can imagine working the qualitative characteristics of something into a formula-like mnemonic for the sake of organizing an argument, but the idea that a value such as (true life + fiction) / 2 is somehow quantifiable is ludicrous.