Although scientists typically insist that their research is very exciting and adventurous when they talk to laymen and prospective students, the allure of this enthusiasm is too often lost in the predictable, stilted structure and language of their scientific publications. I present here, a top-10 list of recommendations for how to write consistently boring scientific publications. I then discuss why we should and how we could make these contributions more accessible and exciting.
First Stanford code poetry slam reveals the literary side of computer code
The Future of Academic Style: Why Citations Still Matter in the Age of Google
Steampunk Ex Machina
Beautiful, meditative video shows how books are made
If I don’t hang my own artwork on the walls of my #steampunk fantasy ship-of-the-line, who...
Neuroscientist Explores the Ethical Quandries of a Digital Afterlife