I’ve been scanning the online coverage of the MIT student who caused a bomb scare when she walked into an airport wearing a blinking circuit board on her sweatshirt.
I’m dismayed by the number of headlines that unquestioningly repeat the authorities’ line that she was wearing a “fake bomb.” Several headlines at least put the term in quotation marks, and a good number of them describe the device more neutrally (as a circuit board) or they avoid mentioning the object at all (with a headline that emphasizes that an MIT student caused a bomb scare, but leaving the cause of the scare for the body of the article).
Similar:
The Day I Stopped Saying ‘Hurry Up’
Adorable photos help tell this story abo...
Culture
Do you get your news mostly from social media? I check NPR, Drudge, and news.google.com.
Do you have a regular news-consumption r...
Culture
Avoid static, wordy nominalization. Prefer compelling verbs.
New graphic for a handout I first posted...
Essays
Students are trusting software like this to do their work.
The technology will continue t...
Culture
Spam: In Your E-Mail and on Your Blog
Spam: In Your E-Mail and on Your Blog&nb...
Business
Wendy's Bests Internet Troll, Then Unwittingly Posts Completely Unrelated, Obscure Racist ...
I fixed the clickbaity title for you. A ...
Business


