Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Sights, Sounds, and Smells of Elizabethan Theater
Somewhere during my education I picked u...
Academia
Paleo-Future: robots
This is from the robots category of Pale...
Aesthetics
Breaking: Student consults syllabus before asking question about course schedule
NASHVILLE, TN – Vanderbilt University is...
Academia
Why Our Brains Make Us Click on Lists
The article-as-numbered-list has several...
Culture
He Googles for some random memes to connect with weak prose, but what he does next is shoc...
Business
All the 'Happy Birthday' song copyright claims are invalid, federal judge rules
In a stunning reversal of decades of c...
Business
Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, 

