03 Apr 2008 [ Prev | Next ]

Aarseth (Ch 1-4)


Categories:

5 Comments

ChrisU said:

"When much energy is spent on showing that P is a perfectly deserving type of Q, the more fundamental question of what P is will often be neglected. These nonproductive (and non-academic) campaigns in favor of marginal media or aesthetic forms of expression are pathetic signs of a larger problem, however: they illustrate only too well the the partial and conservative state of the human sciences, in which nothing can be studied that is not already a field; in which the type rather than the individual qualities of an object determines its value as an accepted member of some canon or another. (Aarseth 16)"


Trackback: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ChristopherUlicne/025123.html

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Recent Comments

DavidCristello on Aarseth (Ch 1-4): http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DavidCristello/2008/04/
ChrisU on Aarseth (Ch 1-4): "When much energy is spent on showing that P is a
Rachel Prichard on Aarseth (Ch 1-4): http://blogs.setonhill.edu/RachelPrichard/2008/04/
Jeremy Barrick on Aarseth (Ch 1-4): My entry lies here: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/Je
Daniella Choynowski on Aarseth (Ch 1-4): http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DaniellaChoynowski/2008
January
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
February
          1 2
3 4 05 6 07 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  
March
            1
2 3 04 5 06 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
April
    01 2 03 4 5
6 7 08 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
May
        01 2 3
4 5 6 7 08 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31