Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II
Argue against a thesis that you promoted in a previous submission. (You don't have to argue against Ex 3-2 -- you could choose a different exercise; at any rate, tell me what exercise you're arguing against, so I can review your previous argument.)
Categories: due_dates
2 Comments
Leave a comment
Recent Comments
Dennis G. Jerz on Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II: You may argue against any previous submission. I w
Timothy Koch on Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II: for this paper, can we argue against any of the pr
Timothy Koch on Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II: for this paper, can we argue against any of the pr
Powered by
August
September
October
November
December
for this paper, can we argue against any of the previous papers we have written? and does it have to be against a paper that we have already done? I'm a little lost and confused with this assignment. thank you for your time and the inconvienence.
Sincerely,
Timothy Koch
You may argue against any previous submission. I would prefer that you do choose an opposing view to balance an argument you made previously, but I would accept a brand new submission. While the thesis should take one side or the other, I am asking that in a short 200-word paragraph that you focus on multiple sides of an issue, so a narrow focus will be better than a broad one.
Tim, I'd be happy to help you identify a topic, though I've got to hit the road now.