18 Nov 2008 [ Prev | Next ]

Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II

Argue against a thesis that you promoted in a previous submission. (You don't have to argue against Ex 3-2 -- you could choose a different exercise; at any rate, tell me what exercise you're arguing against, so I can review your previous argument.)

Categories
:

2 Comments

Timothy Koch said:

for this paper, can we argue against any of the previous papers we have written? and does it have to be against a paper that we have already done? I'm a little lost and confused with this assignment. thank you for your time and the inconvienence.

Sincerely,
Timothy Koch

You may argue against any previous submission. I would prefer that you do choose an opposing view to balance an argument you made previously, but I would accept a brand new submission. While the thesis should take one side or the other, I am asking that in a short 200-word paragraph that you focus on multiple sides of an issue, so a narrow focus will be better than a broad one.

Tim, I'd be happy to help you identify a topic, though I've got to hit the road now.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Recent Comments

Dennis G. Jerz on Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II: You may argue against any previous submission. I w
Timothy Koch on Ex 3-3: Pro/Con II: for this paper, can we argue against any of the pr
August
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
September
  1 02 3 04 5 6
7 8 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
October
      1 02 3 4
5 6 07 8 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
November
            1
2 3 04 5 06 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
December
  1 02 3 04 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31