The Times article adds, from the CIRP survey, that the proportion of students who applied to 12 or more colleges increased by 50 percent from 2001 to 2005. The article does not go on to note that the 50 percent increase brought the percentage from 1.4 to 2.1. Most of the students who are using such strategies, and who turn up in such articles, are from a relatively elite background, educationally and financially.
Kevin Carey, research and policy manager at the think tank Education Sector, pointed out that the statistic would have been far less intimidating had it been presented instead as a 0.7 percent decline in the number of students who didn’t apply to at least 12 colleges.“To me that’s a pretty good example of how you see all these stories that really only apply to a small percent,” Carey said. “For the majority, this whole phenomenon means nothing.”
Carey said that acceptance rate at the most elite institutions are down about one percentage point, but that even at those colleges it’s hard to tell if it’s truly more difficult to get in. Because more applicants in that pool are applying to more places, it could just be that there are just more applications, not more applicants. If that is the case, “it’s not harder to get in, it just seems harder,” Carey said. “It’s not that there are many more students going to college. It’s going up a bit.” —David Epstein —Out of Control Admissions Hype (Inside Higher Ed)
A good article that analyzes some of the statistics cited by media reports.
Shouldn’t that be “out-of-control” (with hyphens)?
I always enjoy my visits to the studio. This recording was a quick one!
After marking a set of bibliography exercises, I created this graphic to focus on the…
Rewatching ST:DS9 Odo walks stiffly into the infirmary, where Bashir scolds him for not taking…
Imagine a society that engineers its highways so that ordinary people who make mistakes, and…
My years of watching MacGyver definitely paid off. (Not that my GenZ students got the…
As a grad student at the University of Toronto, I picked up a bit about…
View Comments
Actually, Will, I created the long "First Amendment" blog entry in a word processor, then copied it over into the HTML form, and I got the same ? instead of curly quotation marks.
When you've got the CVS set up again, let me know -- maybe there's a simple regexpression that I can use to do the conversion.
Since it only seems to have affected this blog entry, I very highly doubt it. The thought crossed my mind, but we're even using almost the same server software (just a newer version), so I suspect that the text you copied and pasted simply had funny characters for the quotation marks.
Thanks, those are curly punctuation marks that didn't get translated into HTML properly. I'll fix it.
Do you think that could have something to do with the way the new server delivers HTML pages?
Dennis - for some reason, there's a whole bunch of extra question marks scattered throughout this blog entry for me, on both mozilla and internet explorer...