A great introduction to some of the reasons why I love studying the English language. From John McIntyre’s You Don’t Say.
The malapropism: This venerable category of errors
derives from the delicious and eponymous Mrs. Malaprop from Richard
Brinsley Sheridan’s The Rivals of 1775. Mrs. Malaprop (from the French mal a propos) pretentiously and unknowingly substitutes the wrong word for a similar-sounding correct one in her pronouncements, such as an allegory on the banks of the Nile. Or, more comprehensively: If I reprehend any thing in this world, it is the use of my oracular tongue, and a nice derangement of epitaphs! (apprehend, vernacular, arrangement, epithets).The Spoonerism:
The Rev. Archibald Spooner, warden of New College, Oxford, has given
his name to a tongue-twisted error in which portions of words are
transposed in phrases to give new and incongruous meanings. May I sew you to a sheet? for show you to a seat and the toast To our queer old dean for dear old queen are
representative examples. Though the Rev. Mr. Spooner was said to be
given to this sort of thing, it appears that many Spoonerisms
attributed to him are entirely apocryphal.The mondegreen:
In an 1954 essay Sylvia Wright gave this word its impetus by desribing
how as a child she had understood a line in the ballad “The Bonnie Earl
O’Murray,” laid him on the green, as Lady Mondegreen.
A mondegreen is a misunderstood rendering of the text of a songf or
poem. The child’s hearing the hymn “Gladly the Cross I’d Bear” as
“Gladly, the Cross-Eyed Bear” is a famous mondegreen. Rock music, given
the roaring instrumentation and slack articulation of the singers, is
fertile soil for mondegreens.The eggcorn: The
linguist Geoffrey Pullum has given us this term for an erroneous
transformation of a stock expression into a new one that only appears
to make sense. Free reign, hone in and baited breath*
are typical examples. They appear to rise typically from
misunderstandings of spoken English as it is translated into the
written version.The Cupertino: Technology has
given us a new class of error identified at Language Log as the
Cupertino: an error induced by careless use of electronic
spell-checking — a form of cooperation transmuted into Cupertino. The Sun once
presented a notable example in an article referring to Kunta Kinte, the
protagonist of Alex Haley’s Roots, as Chunter Knit. It should be
superfluous to point out that only a fool sets a spell-check program to
run automatically.
Another corner building. Designed and textured. Needs an interior. #blender3d #design #aesthetics #medievalyork #mysteryplay
What have my students learned about creative nonfiction writing? During class they are collaborating on…
Two years after the release of ChatGPT, it may not be surprising that creative work…
I both like and hate that Canvas tracks the number of unmarked assignments that await…
The complex geometry on this wedge building took me all weekend. The interior walls still…
My older siblings say they remember our mother sitting them down to watch a new…
View Comments
Yes, I remember that. I also remember some time in the 80s a financial report came out saying that a particular company's quarterly results were "in the Afro-American." (Maybe that was an urban legend, but since lots of people were using word processors for the first time then, and because "Afro-American" had a notably short lifespan as the preferred term, that example jumps out at me in my memory.)
I hope you saw the recent Cupertino-style problem with the Christian news website (onenewsnow.com) and the American sprinter Tyson Gay? The site automatically changes the word "gay" to "homosexual", so their headline read, "Homosexual eases into 100 finals at Olympic trials". Oops!