Jerz, "Fatworld Review"

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/SusanCarmichael/2010/01/fatworld_is_a_fat_dud.html

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/KeithCampbell/2010/01/fatworld_and_just_getting_fatt.html

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JeremyBarrick/2010/01/el_250_fatworld_review.html

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MattTakacs/2010/01/fatworld_falls_flat.html

Bear in mind that reading a review of a game is a pale substitute for playing a game. I wrote this during the last time I taught this course, so students would have a model of critical analysis that stands somewhere between "new games journalism" subjectivity, and rigorous (time-consuming) academic research.

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/CodyNaylor/2010/01/more_educational_games.html

A discussion of why games need to be technologically sound before they can accomplish anything else.
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ElizabethSwartzwelder/2010/01/fatworld_needs_a_makeover_too.html

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MichellePolly/2010/01/fatworld_who_you_callin_fat.html

http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JessicaKrehlik/2010/01/review_of_a_review.html