April 2008 Archives

This assignment was originally due Tuesday, but I've extended the deadline so that now it's due at 9am Apr 30. I'm doing this partially so that you can focus on your final blog portfolio and your final assigned reading for Tuesday's class..

Blogger Andy Baio raises numerous technological, cultural, and ethical questions. First, take a look at how I introduce the subject on my blog, then post your agenda item responding to Baio's entry:

From an anonymous source close to the company, I've found myself in possession of the "Infocom Drive" -- a complete backup of Infocom's shared network drive from 1989. This is one of the most amazing archives I've ever seen, a treasure chest documenting the rise and fall of the legendary interactive fiction game company. Among the assets included: design documents, email archives, employee phone numbers, sales figures, internal meeting notes, corporate newsletters, and the source code and game files for every released and unreleased game Infocom made.

For obvious reasons, I can't share the whole Infocom Drive. But I have to share some of the best parts. It's just too good.

Come to class ready to discuss your thesis statement and a blueprint for the rest of your paper.  Feel free to use this space to coordinate peer-reviews. You are also welcome to e-mail me.

See the instructions for the April 17 thesis assignment for more about Paper 2.

Please write two agenda items.

Update, Apr 19: On his Mechanisms blog, Kirschenbaum issued an invitation to SHU students who have questions for him. I invite you to take him up on his offer, and post your agenda items on his book blog (if you wish).

Come to class with a proposed topic for your term paper (15 pages, with outside research).

Paper 2 is a researched term paper (about 15 pages) that uses evidence from our assigned readings and outside scholarship (including peer-reviewed academic articles, but optionally also including essays, fiction, and other intellectually significant material) to defend a non-obvious claim about the history of the book, as seen through print and/or digital culture.

Just as it was acceptable for you to refer to digital culture in Paper 1, I'm perfectly willing to let you refer to oral/manuscript culture for Paper 2, but the thesis should somehow address material we have covered more recently.

As you know by now, I don't assign paper topics; coming up with a good topic is part of the assignment, and we will devote class time to it.

A 15-page research paper is not something to attempt in one sitting, or one weekend.

Start researching now, so that you can find peer-reviewed academic sources now, before you have committed to a topic.

Review -- see the tips I posted for Ex 3. Remember especially this example, in which the first and last paragraph model good academic writing, but the middle section is wordy and vague:

Quotations can make or break an academic argument. Some quotations, like the ones Johnson calls "the bedrock of scholarly discourse" (35), are "tightly integrated into the very fabric of the argument" (Smith 234).  The author carefully selects "the juciest, most meaning-laden words" (Lee 125) from multiple different authors, and works them into "an original chain of thoughts" (Johnson 131) linked by a structure designed to guide the reader toward a "non-obvious conclusion" (Brown 101).

But I also want to talk about a different kind of quotation -- one that the author prefaces with a wordy introduction that wastes words by referring directly to the mechanics of scholarly work.  We see an example of this kind of wordy, inefficient use of an outside source in the way that I am introducing the next quotation.

When an author spends two or three sentences calling attention to the fact that a good quote is coming that will illustrate a certain point, the author has usually already made that point through paraphrase by the time the quote actually comes around. Continuing with a paragraph that summarizes the outside author's main point makes the quote itself even more painfully extraneous. (McTeague 156)

As this quote shows, the habit of first talking in general about a topic, then quoting a long passage that supports a specific claim, and then following up with several more sentences that summarize the content of the quote, distracts from the author's ability to support an original argument. McTeague is saying that the habit of writing three separate sections -- the introduction, the quote itself, and the explanation of the quote -- can be very wordy, if you think in terms of writing several sentences for each section. You can generate a lot of words that fill the page, but the redundancy means that those words will contain few ideas.

On the other hand, a scholarly argument that quotes only the "most meaning-laden words" (Lee 125) not only avoids redundancy, but "results in more persuasive arguments" (McTeague 158) that enable both reader and writer to "engage with abstract ideas on a more advanced level" (Smith 230).

Please write two agenda items.

Please write two agenda items.

The Kindle is an e-book reader that we hope to have in Reeves Library for you to check out. For this exercise, analyze your experience using the Kindle, applying material from the course to your experience. The essay isn't actually due until the last day

Students sign up to present on two of the four forum dates.

Presenters: Anchor your presentation in a deeper exploration of ideas examined in at least one essay from Writing Material that are not part of the required reading. Demonstrate your ability to use what you have learned so far to defend a non-obvious position on an issue that will teach something of value to the class. Draw the attention of the class to particular passages in WM that are not on the required reading list.

Suggestions from WM: Douglas, Malcolm X, Borges, Baker, Porter, Twain; also, another appropriate passage is McLuhan 265-279.

Possible case study: "The Defense of Fort McHenry"

Also skim Aarseth (Ch 6 & 7)

Make use of the portions of Brookfield that we haven't used so far.