26 Jan 2010 [ Prev | Next ]

English Essay vs. News Story

You may already be very familiar with writing college essays. Those personal narratives, interpretive theses, and research papers are all great preparation for news writing. 

Nevertheless, your goals as a news writer are different, so what counts as "good writing" is also different.

English Essay News Story


Audience: Your Instructor 

Usually, the instructor knows more about the subject than the student-author.


Audience: The General Reader 

Usually, the reporter knows more about the subject than the general reader. 

Essays for Your Instructor 

  • Your academic goal is to demonstrate how much you know or what you can do.
  • Your instructor does not expect you to be an expert. You write as a learner..
  • You can trust your instructor to correct your mistakes. .Your teacher will read your work with an expert eye, ready to call your attention to claims that are inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete. 

Journalism for the General Public 

  • A journalist aims to inform the reader.
  • The journalist writes from a position of authority. The news is supposed to be a source of verified facts, not just a vehicle for passing along what people are saying. (We will cover the term "verification" later.)
  • Readers depend upon you for accuracy. Most will not know when you are wrong, and most will be too busy to double-check your research. (That's why they read your article, to save themselves time and effort.)

Personal Perspective

  • In high school, you may have been asked to express your feelings, perhaps by explaining what you would have done if you were in the protagonist's place, or relating a concept to your own life.
  • You used phrases like "I think" or "I feel" or "now that I look more closely at it..." in order to tell the story of how you came to your present understanding of a subject or incident.
  • Your teacher rewarded you for demonstrating personal involvement with the subject, because students who engage in this manner are generally more likely to learn the subject matter.  

Objective Perspective

  • Traditional journalists stay out of the story.  No "I" or "me" (and no "this reporter," either). (Reporters have various strategies for writing as an "Invisible Observer.")
  • Journalists report the emotions and opinions of the sources they interview --not their own personal feelings. (Traditional news reporting attributes every emotion, opinion, or prediction to a specific, named source -- avoid "some people say" or "it has been said.")
  • Journalism investigates each story from the perspective of those who care -- including those whose reasons for caring conflict with each other, or with the journalist's personal values. (If it's not interesting to you, it may be interesting to someone.)


Instead of a thesis or research question, a news article has a lead (or "lede"). Instead of long paragraphs designed to convince professors that you understand your subject, a news article has short paragraphs with details carefully chosen to help non-experts understand your subject.


Academic Essay

An essay begins with a question, and builds towards a persuasive answer.  It progresses from uncertainty to certainty, by carefully arranging evidence in order to persuade the reader.

When done well, the academic essay 

  1. identifies a specific, complex problem with no clear solution (the "research question")
  2. proposes a non-obvious, debatable answer ("thesis")
  3. examines evidence for and against the thesis, carefully stripping away the impossible and the unlikely, in a well-organized march towards the truth ("argument")
  4. offers and defends a final opinion ("conclusion") emphasizing the significance of the preceding debate and how it supported the thesis.  

While it is only one possible way to frame an academic argument, the "five-paragraph essay" is often a significant influence on the writing habits of college students.

 

Inverted Pyramid

A traditional news story begins with a lead (a micro-summary, in one or two sentences), and continues with a hierarchy of details, from most to least important. 



A news story is not necessarily chronological.

Some journalism uses narrative to powerful effect (for instance, describing what happens when a famous musician plays at a busy subway station).

But consider a two-hour school board meeting, with an agenda that lists 12 items.  

Depending on what matters to your readers, you might lead with item 8, spend a paragraph each on items 2 and 9, and mention items 4, 11, 3, and 7 in a single sentence. Then you might continue with more details about item 8, more about 2 and 9, and trail off with even more details about item 8.

A really good reporter might walk up to the officials after the meeting and ask a question about something that wasn't even on the agenda.

 

Flowery, Roundabout Puffery

Your high school teachers probably rewarded you for writing grammatically correct sentences in almost any context.


You might have been faced with the dilemma of how to respond appropriately to the significant praise your well-meaning teachers gave you for completing assignments that demonstrated a flair for words, and that being the case, possibly decided to respond by immediately developing the questionable habit of adding numerous unnecessary modifiers wherever humanly possible, never even once missing the alluring chance to boldly puff up your simple writing with all manner of clever, expressive adjectives and elegantly willing adverbs, endlessly repeating your ideas over and over, each subsequent time using ever more and more elaborate language, doubling up and even tripling up with lists and paraphrases and elaborations, to inflate and draw out your sentences, your paragraphs and your essays, determinedly and painfully stretching your one idea to reach the required word count, and in the process of filling as much valuable space on the open, willing page as you possibly can, tried showing off.



You might have been faced with the dilemma of how to respond appropriately to the significant praise your well-meaning teachers gave you for completing assignments that demonstrated a flair for words, and that being the case, possibly decided to respond by immediately developing the questionable habit of adding numerous unnecessary modifiers wherever humanly possible, never even once missing the alluring chance to boldly puff up your simple writing with all manner of clever, expressive adjectives and elegantly willing adverbs, endlessly repeating your ideas over and over, each subsequent time using ever more and more elaborate language, doubling up and even tripling up with lists and paraphrases and elaborations, to inflate and draw out your sentences, your paragraphs and your essays, determinedly and painfully stretching your one idea to reach the required word count, and in the process of filling as much valuable space on the open, willing page as you possibly can, tried showing off.



Clarity

Clear writing packs power.

Since Fred Smith was elected mayor six months ago, the city saw the local unemployment rate drop to 4%.

 Here, does "since" mean "because" or "after"?

Unemployment dropped to 4%, six months after Fred Smith brought his economic reforms to the mayor's office.

The revision begins begins with the subject and an active verb, a sure-fire way of emphasizing the main idea. Let's consider another example:  

The reason the tax reform project failed to secure necessary support is the mayor's underestimating the negative impact of unexpected turnpike construction delays on public attitudes.

 

This dreary passage avoids grammatical mistakes, but the abstract subject "reason" and the colorless verb "is" smother the action.

 

The reason The tax reforms project failed to secure necessary support is the because the mayor's underestimated the negative impact of unexpected turnpike construction delays on public attitudes.

 

Now the sentence opens clearly with the clear, concrete subject "tax reforms" and the active verb "failed." We've already trimmed some deadwood; now let's work on parallel structure, moving things around to emphasize the two things the mayor underestimated:

 

The tax reforms failed because the mayor underestimated the negative impact of unexpected turnpike construction delays on public attitudes and the unexpected turnpike construction delays.

 

Now, we'll further tweak the sentence, highlighting the relationship between the two reasons.
 

The tax reforms failed because the mayor underestimated the duration of the turnpike repairs and the anger of inconvenienced commuters.

 
 


Categories: ,

Leave a comment

August
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
September
      1 02 3 4
5 06 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
October
          1 02
3 04 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
November
  01 2 3 04 5 6
7 08 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
December
      1 02 3 4
5 06 07 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31