Portfolio 3
The same instructions as the last portfolio, but with Krug instead of Killian in section 1A.
1A) Write a new blog entry that offers a thoughtful, reflective critique of Krug's Don't Make Me Think, bearing in mind that the book was originally published in 2000. (How well has it held up? What could be improved in a new edition?)
* You may include links to entries you have previously posted, and/or links to what your classmates have written on the subject.
1B) As you did for your last portfolio, create a portfolio entry on your weblog, with a title that emphasizes what you feel you have accomplished so far this term. Write a brief introduction that introduces the class and your portfolio to a reader who doesn't know the purpose of the assignment or what the class is supposed to cover.
2) Use material you have posted on your blog to support your statement about what you learned. You may give a simple bulleted list, or you may write a paragraph that includes key words that link to specific pages on your site.
When including a blog entry, write some significant words, such as the title of the entry or the reason you are including it in your blog, and turn those significant words into a link. (Please don't use neutral words like "click here" or "my homework" or "foreshadowing in 'A Good Man Is Hard to Find'" for the links... make your words communicate the insight contained in your blog entry: "Emily Dickinson is a sick cookie.")
Sort and organize your entries into the following broad categories. (I definitely do NOT want just the URLs of every entry you have posted.)
2A) Coverage: Link to one or several entries that include a direct quote from the assigned reading, that identify the source of the quote, and that links back to the course web page devoted to that reading.
2B) Timeliness: Link to one or several entries that you posted on time (such as agenda items posted 24 hours before the class discussion, or reflection papers posted before the class meeting... something you posted during a classroom exercise would be a weak contribution here).
2C) Interaction: Include one or several entries that demonstrate your ability to interact with peers. Your entry might link to something a classmate posted, or your entry might have attracted comments from peers. If someone leaves a comment, you should reply to the comment in order to try to keep the conversation going.
2D) Depth: Include one or several links to entry on your blog that shows your ability to write in depth.
2E) Discussion: Include one or several links to a page on a classmate's blog where you left a significant comment that was part of a fruitful discussion. (Would "Good job!" or "LOL" count as significant comments? Probably not.)
3) Submit your portfolio by posting a link to it on this page.
Categories: due_dates
requirements?
OK, I'll post the details, which are the same as last time, just with the new textbook.
The first 100th of the portfolio is done anyway. The Krug Criticism.
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JedidiahFetterman/2008/11/the_absolute_krug.html
My Krug Evaluation
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AjaHannah/2008/11/krugs_great_lack_of_thought.html
I love how it takes five minutes for MT to sort out the links for the portfolios.
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JedidiahFetterman/2008/11/concentration.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DaniellaChoynowski/2008/11/200.html
i love how MT still says my blog is loading
Krug:
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JacquelynJohns/2008/11/krug_the_archetype.html
Krug:
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JessicaKrehlik/2008/11/im_thinking_too_muchkrug_revie.html
Portfolio 3
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JacquelynJohns/2008/11/a_blogging_portfolio_a_new_int.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AjaHannah/2008/11/when_thought_applies.html
I tried something a little different...
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AndrewLoNigro/2008/11/blogging-portfo-4.html
Krug Critique
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AnneWilliams/2008/11/krug_critique.html
Portfolio 3. keeps gettin better!
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AnneWilliams/2008/11/portfolio_3_intermediate.html
Here we go...
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/KevinHinton/2008/11/the-path-that-h.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MichellePolly/2008/11/portfolio_3_1.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ChelseaOliver/2008/11/and-you-cant-fight-the-tears-t.html
Krug
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MeganSeigh/2008/11/the_aftermath_of_krug.html
Portfolio
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/JessicaKrehlik/2008/11/users_are_the_jelly_to_designe.html
Portfolio 3
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MeganSeigh/2008/11/is_it_getting_harder_or_easier.html
Philosophical insights (without the philosophy):
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/MadelynGillespie/2008/11/my_how_time_flies.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DenamarieErcolani/2008/11/portfolio-3.html
Krug: http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ChristinaCelona/2008/11/dont_make_me_review.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/ChristinaCelona/2008/11/portfolio_3.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/KepingWang/2008/11/portfolio_3.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/AlexandriaHull/2008/11/concentrate_and_keep_moving_al.html
http://blogs.setonhill.edu/DavidWilbanks/2008/11/portfolio_usability_wikipedia.html