It is the one great weakness of journalism as a picture of our modern existence, that it must be a picture made up entirely of exceptions. We announce on flaring posters that a man has fallen off a scaffolding. We do not announce on flaring posters that a man has not fallen off a scaffolding. Yet this latter fact is fundamentally more exciting, as indicating that that moving tower of terror and mystery, a man, is still abroad upon the earth. That the man has not fallen off a scaffolding is really more sensational; and it is also some thousand times more common. But journalism cannot reasonably be expected thus to insist upon the permanent miracles. Busy editors cannot be expected to put on their posters, “Mr. Wilkinson Still Safe,” or “Mr. Jones, of Worthing, Not Dead Yet.” They cannot announce the happiness of mankind at all. They cannot describe all the forks that are not stolen, or all the marriages that are not judiciously dissolved. Hence the complete picture they give of life is of necessity fallacious; they can only represent what is unusual. However democratic they may be, they are only concerned with the minority. –G.K. Chesterton, The Ball and the Cross —G.K. Chesterton: on ‘The one great weakness of journalism’ (Mode for Caleb)
Think of this the next time the TV news anchor tells you to “stay tuned” for coverage of a shocking survey or university study.
View Comments
The great weakness is that journalists are so biased towards sensationalism, mystery, and tragedy that they invent it not only in which stories they cover (choosing stories that they think will be popular for readers and advertisers), but in how they cover them (by deemphasizing the mundane and complicated aspects of a story, or ignoring them altogether).
BTW: The only TV news I watch is The Daily Show ;)
"journalism cannot reasonably be expected ...to insist upon the permanent miracles" ...BRILLIANT!