The other day at the Westmoreland Museum of American Art, I attended a brown bag talk given by my Seton Hill colleague, Maureen Vissat, The Art of the 1940s: Styles and Influences. I had seen her present as part of a series of teaching demonstrations, so I knew her talk would be excellent. She wove interesting details from the lives of notable painters and gallerists to form an informative picture of how art and artists are made, and the dual role of the gallery as archive of what is already established and promoter of the new and innovative. Her slide show included several shots of the gallery spaces, not just close-ups of the paintings or portraits of the artists themselves.
Her talk was timed to coincide with an exhibit of American painters of the 1940s. Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be a permalink for this gallery, but for the moment, and presumably unitl the exhibit closes in October, there’s a description on the current exhibitions page.
[T]his exhibition reconstructs a sampling of the exhibitions of the same title organized by Carnegie Institute in Pittsburgh (now Carnegie Museum of Art) from 1943 to 1949 and includes 48 paintings, of which 42 are the actual works that were selected for exhibitions over the seven-year period. These annual exhibitions of American painting replaced the Institute’s annual Carnegie International while it was suspended due to World War II.
I’ve included thumbnails of some of my favorite paintings below.
I particularly liked the juxtaposition of these two pictures, one right
above the other. Look at the chunky three-dimensonality of “Arrangement
in Form II” (Arthur Dove), where there’s hardly a single straight line.
And contrast that with a more geometrical 2-D piece that uses the same color pallet — “The Silver Tanks” (Niles Spencer).
On a nearby wall, a painting that invites further reflection on the relationship between the natural and the mechanical is Arthur Osver’s “The Red Ventilator.”
Look at the little water tower to the left, and the tiny shape of
the man. That ventilator looks like it’s ready to walk off the painting
and into the gallery — not because it has photorealistic textures or
shows ray-tracing reflections and ambient diffusion shadows, but
because there’s a sense of both whimsy and menace in the incongruity —
this hulking metal object, presumably designed to keep miners alive so
they can feed our growing industrial nation, takes on — almost in
spite of itself — this organic form, like blood vessels and arteries,
or tree roots. I just love this painting.
The exhibition is open through October 19. On Thursday, July 31, the curator, Barbara Jones. is giving a tour. I won’t be able to attend, but I thought I’d blog about it in the hopes someone else who’s in the area will be inspired to go.
More than half of the teens surveyed believe journalists regularly engage in unethical behaviors like…
Pope Leo XIV, who has made peace and unity priorities of his pontificate, emphasized that…
My classes are generally small enough that I have time to get to know each…
View Comments
I'm so glad you blogged about this!
Art and literature are my two favorite ways to learn about history. I honestly didn't know I could enjoy art in this way until having Maureen for my STW teacher at SHU, but after that I was inspired to take History of Western Art instead of WCT. (Maureen has a way of making history more vivid as she teaches it, so honestly I think if I would have taken WCT I would have had to have it with her!)
I think that having art history courses helped me as a lit major because I was able to set a visual grip on history and apply it to what I've read. I would encourage any literature major to take art history classes just to get a more realistic perception of history as it happened. Seeing connections between the two was always really exciting to me.