Predictably, Wired celebrates the freedom that comes from depending on computers instead if your own memory. (The story includes a link to Nicholas Carr’s opposing view.)
By sharing and comparing our memories, we can ensure that we still have some facts in common, that we all haven’t disappeared down the private rabbit hole of our own reconsolidations. In this sense, instinctually wanting to Google information – to not entrust trivia to the fallible brain – is a perfectly healthy impulse. (I’ve used Google to correct my errant memories thousands of times.) I don’t think it’s a sign that technology is rotting our cortex – I think it shows that we’re wise enough to outsource a skill we’re not very good at. Because while the web enables all sorts of other biases – it lets us filter news, for instance, to confirm what we already believe – the use of the web as a vessel of transactive memory is mostly virtuous. We save hard drive space for what matters, while at the same time improving the accuracy of recall. —Is Google Ruining Your Memory? | Wired Science | Wired.com.
Post was last modified on 16 Jul 2011 2:59 pm
Five cameras, adding up to ~100 hours of footage. I'm almost at the halfway point…
Tickets for To Battle: A Fight Play
Coders who used AI self-reported that they worked 20% faster, but an objective study found…
I had a great time narrating and coming up with the character voices for this…