I’m getting ready to introduce my freshman writing students to college-level research, so I found it helpful to read this brief introduction to the internal problems Wikipedia creates for itself.
When a major news event takes place, such as the Boston Marathon bombings, complex, widely sourced entries spring up within hours and evolve by the minute. Because there is no other free information source like it, many online services rely on Wikipedia. Look something up on Google or ask Siri a question on your iPhone, and you’ll often get back tidbits of information pulled from the encyclopedia and delivered as straight-up facts.
Yet Wikipedia and its stated ambition to “compile the sum of all human knowledge” are in trouble. The volunteer workforce that built the project’s flagship, the English-language Wikipedia—and must defend it against vandalism, hoaxes, and manipulation—has shrunk by more than a third since 2007 and is still shrinking. Those participants left seem incapable of fixing the flaws that keep Wikipedia from becoming a high-quality encyclopedia by any standard, including the project’s own. —MIT Technology Review.
Post was last modified on 23 Oct 2013 10:12 am
I was approached on LinkedIn with the opportunity to work to help train an AI,…
Support the humans who make art in your community. Death of a Salesman. #wirerecorderlife #fountainpenlife…
Beautiful set. Support the humans who do arts in your community (instead of settling for…
Vibing to a park saxophonist as I code for an upcoming conference presentation, and wait…
Details for a modular mid-range scoutship, from the #steampunk #neovictorian bedtime stories I used to…
Proper commenting is an important part of coding any project, especially in an educational context.…
View Comments