The whole affair shows that in fact bad writing is a joint academic/public matter, and to broach it as one would in a professional journal article or seminar presentation is to continue to theorize as if theory were never in doubt. In “interrogating the terms” of “bad” or “difficult” indictments, the contributors follow an academic routine, sometimes very well, but they miss how the hubbub challenged the social and political meaning of their work. —Mark BauerleinBad Writing’s Back (Philosophy and Literature)

Share
Published by
Dennis G. Jerz

Recent Posts

This is manageable. Far better than some semesters.

This is manageable. Far better than some semesters.

7 hours ago

Creating textures for background buildings in a medieval theater simulation project. I can always improve this later. #blender3d

Creating textures for background buildings in a medieval theater simulation project. I can always improve…

1 day ago

Yesterday my stack of unmarked assignments was about 120, so this is not bad.

Nothing in this stack is pressing, but they do include rough drafts of final papers,…

2 days ago

ai, ai, ai: critical thinking and literacy won’t save you

Here’s the underlying problem. We have an operating image of thought, an understanding of what…

2 days ago

Representing the Humanities at Accepted Students Day.

Representing the Humanities at Accepted Students Day.

5 days ago

The daughter opens another show. This weekend only.

The daughter opens another show. This weekend only.

6 days ago