Truth is: The flow goes both ways. We don’t move invisibly through the links, we leave a fine trail, much more real than pixie dust, but as intangible. Gathering information, we leave a trail of information. The ivory tower does not protect us here, and there are no sets of information gathering ethics protecting the subjects clicking on a link online. There shold be though. Information is power, and the right to gather and display information should definitely be discussed in a wide range of contexts. —Torill Mortensen —Privacy, scrutiny and research ethics (thinking with my fingers)
A concise, powerful insight into the privacy debate that flared up last week in the corner of the blogosphere amorphous, many-tendrilled subnexus of the blogosphere where I hang my virtual hat.
This is manageable. Far better than some semesters.
Creating textures for background buildings in a medieval theater simulation project. I can always improve…
Nothing in this stack is pressing, but they do include rough drafts of final papers,…
Here’s the underlying problem. We have an operating image of thought, an understanding of what…
Representing the Humanities at Accepted Students Day.
The daughter opens another show. This weekend only.
View Comments
Dennis: I liked Dr. Walker's comment on her blogsite that she gives after quoting your comments on the Wired article.
"This, perhaps, is the true meaning of privacy: the right to choose which of your actions are up to public scrutiny. Or at least to know when you?re entering a zone in which your actions are public. If I assume that every blog I read is tracking and publicly displaying the fact that I have read, I?m going to read very differently, and perhaps not at all." The public nature of blogs makes writers more conscious of audience: we perform literate acts with verbal acuity to facilitate conversation with others. Privacy is proportional to what we choose to articulate.