When you think about it, the Times may have it backward. It charges $1 for the latest news in print, and offers it free over the Web, but for old material demands $3, which is three times the price of an entire newspaper. —Adam L. Penenberg —Searching for the New York Times (Wired)
The NY Times is a great paper, but you have to register to read articles, and they quickly dissapear into paid archives. So it’s not making a dent online. There are ways to get around it, but I haven’t found it worth the trouble. It’s also possible to get Salon articles for free (if you sit through a long commercial), but there’s plenty of other good stuff online that will be less annoying to read.
Similar:
I MacGyvered myself a heat sink
I'm getting ready to record about 18hrs ...
Design
Maybe I'll just delete these QUARTER OF A MILLION spam comments.
Not kidding -- 254,460 spam comments in ...
Cyberculture
I’m a High Schooler. AI Is Demolishing My Education.
AI has transformed my experience of ed...
Books
Why I Rarely Blog about My Home Building Projects
We're kind of in the eye of the storm, b...
Modding
Never use very. Write the word damn instead. Your editor will strike out the damn.
Culture
Unification, Part 2 (#StarTrek #TNG Rewatch, Season 5, Episode 8) Spock Nurtures Romulan P...
Rewatching ST:TNG Beyond stating ...
Drama



I love this. So true! Can’t believe I never thought of it this way. The $ is tied to the archive, not the breaking news…the past has become the treasure chest of the media, not the present.