She banned competitive activities during school hours. —The Evil of Excellence (JoanneJacobs.com)
There’s a good discussion sparked by an American School Board Journal article (the content of this URL will probably change when the next issue comes out) that strongly discourages any kind of competition in the classroom.
Even a teacher who praises “Madison” for cutting straight lines and nicely gluing glitter on her letter M is singled out for censure.
Similar:
War via TikTok: Russia's new tool for propaganda machine
“This is the way they go to war; it’s ...
Current_Events
We Had the Vaccine the Whole Time
You may be surprised to learn that of th...
Current_Events
Why We Forget Most of the Books We Read
It was pleasurable to encounter a famili...
Books
Prime Stage Theatre to end 2018-2019 season with Shakespeare comedy Twelfth Night, May 3–1...
2019 Pittsburgh Public Theater Shakespea...
Culture
Your Students Learn by Doing, Not by Listening
Today one of my students gave a final pr...
Academia
Games Without Frontiers: Victory in Vomit
Wired reviews Mirror's Edge
When you ru...
Aesthetics
The cooperative and socialization goals make a lot more sense in elementary school than in high school. I like some of the experiments that you’ve mentioned in your blog about making students responsible for their peer’s learning… I have a little of that in my blogging portfolio (particularly the “xenoblogging” component), and of course that’s an important part of class participation, but I hated group work when I was a student, so I don’t emphasize it very much in my own teaching. (That wasn’t true when I used to teach technical writing, when group projects were an important part of the syllabus.)
Thanks for passing this one along. I think the originating article by Susan Black still offers some good strategies on stressing cooperation over competition, even if her implicit zeal to curb competition in the classroom is overdone or pollyanna. Black stresses that teachers need to emphasize: 1. Positive interdependence (i.e., rewarding teamework); 2. Individual accountability (i.e., students are held accountable for both agreed-upon standards and to the team rather than just the teacher); 3. Face-to-face interaction (i.e., group work that interacts with the teacher); 4. Social skills (i.e., leadership and decision making activities applied to the group). 5. Group processing (i.e., student groups evaluate themselves).
If one of the hidden curricula of schools is to socialize, then social-oriented teaching seems like a good idea to me. Competition by nature puts the needs of the one over the needs of the many.