She banned competitive activities during school hours. —The Evil of Excellence (JoanneJacobs.com)
There’s a good discussion sparked by an American School Board Journal article (the content of this URL will probably change when the next issue comes out) that strongly discourages any kind of competition in the classroom.
Even a teacher who praises “Madison” for cutting straight lines and nicely gluing glitter on her letter M is singled out for censure.
Similar:
Should the AP Really Have Fired This Pulitzer-Prize War Photographer?
The original shot caught a Syrian rebel ...
Aesthetics
Schieffer: 'We Now Don't Know Where People Get Their News'
The legendary Bob Schieffer is calling i...
Culture
You, Too, Can Have a Viral Tweet Like Mine: Demystifying Poetic Meter
Saving for the next time I teach "Intro ...
Academia
In Which I Bow Before the Mistress of Teen Snark
The Girl: I'm sorry I'm being so...
Me:...
Culture
AI-generated essays are nothing to worry about (opinion)
After reviewing 22 AI essays I asked my ...
Academia
CNN's Chris Cillizza on Trump's definition of "Fake News"
Here's some excellent analysis of Trump'...
Culture
The cooperative and socialization goals make a lot more sense in elementary school than in high school. I like some of the experiments that you’ve mentioned in your blog about making students responsible for their peer’s learning… I have a little of that in my blogging portfolio (particularly the “xenoblogging” component), and of course that’s an important part of class participation, but I hated group work when I was a student, so I don’t emphasize it very much in my own teaching. (That wasn’t true when I used to teach technical writing, when group projects were an important part of the syllabus.)
Thanks for passing this one along. I think the originating article by Susan Black still offers some good strategies on stressing cooperation over competition, even if her implicit zeal to curb competition in the classroom is overdone or pollyanna. Black stresses that teachers need to emphasize: 1. Positive interdependence (i.e., rewarding teamework); 2. Individual accountability (i.e., students are held accountable for both agreed-upon standards and to the team rather than just the teacher); 3. Face-to-face interaction (i.e., group work that interacts with the teacher); 4. Social skills (i.e., leadership and decision making activities applied to the group). 5. Group processing (i.e., student groups evaluate themselves).
If one of the hidden curricula of schools is to socialize, then social-oriented teaching seems like a good idea to me. Competition by nature puts the needs of the one over the needs of the many.