Dickens is so brilliant a stylist, his vision of the world so idiosyncratic and yet so telling, that one might say that his subject is his unique rendering of his subject, in an echo of Mark Rothko’s statement, “The subject of the painting is the painting”—except of course, Dickens’s great subject was nothing so subjective or so exclusionary, but as much of the world as he could render. If Dickens’s prose fiction has “defects”—excesses of melodrama, sentimentality, contrived plots, and manufactured happy endings—these are the defects of his era, which for all his greatness Dickens had not the rebellious spirit to resist; he was at heart a crowd-pleaser, a theatrical entertainer, with no interest in subverting the conventions of the novel… —The New York Review of Books.
The Mystery of Charles Dickens by Joyce Carol Oates
There has been a paradigm shift in t...
Culture
For David N. DeVries, the critical think...
Academia
If it were possible to build a digit...
Books
When I initially wrote this introduction...
Cyberculture
Saving for the next time I teach "Intro ...
Academia
If the seasonal fluctuation represents t...
Books



