Scientists are no different in their level of objectivity than are other professionals. They are careful in the analysis of evidence and in the procedures applied to arrive at conclusions. With this admission, it may seem that this myth is valid, but contributions from both the philosophy of science and psychology reveal that there are at least three major reasons that make complete objectivity impossible. —William McComas —Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know
A 1996 article.
Similar:
Insipidest. Play. Ever. --Pepys, on "A Midsummer Night's Dream." Sort of.
After attending a performance of Midsumm...
Culture
Letter to the editor: Setting record straight on Seton Hill newspaper
Here's my letter responding to an recent...
Academia
State officials: Bushy Run staff must consult with Native groups before staging reenactmen...
When my kids were younger, trips to Busy...
Culture
Peer Review Paranoia: The system is built on trust between scholars. AI is undermining tha...
From an essay that includes a reflection...
Academia
#Gamergate—and what it means for gaming in education
Gamergate originally began as a hashtag ...
Academia
MTV VMAs: Will Smith Family's Reaction Was to Gaga, Not Miley (Video)
I didn't watch the show, but I did see t...
Business
