It’s tempting to leave the story there, and to let the hypernovel, or whatever you want to call it, become part of the technological imagination of the past, like the flying car. But I believe that the promise of hypertext fiction is worth pursuing, even now, or maybe especially now. On the one hand, e-books are beginning to offer writers technical possibilities that, being human, we’re going to be unable to resist. On the other, the form fits with life now. So much of what we do is hyperlinked and mediated by screens that it feels important to find a way to reflect on that condition, and fiction, literature, has long afforded us the possibility of reflection. —Why the books future never happened — entertainment.salon.com — Readability.
Similar:
Weaving: Breathing: Thinking: The poetics of Emerson's Nature
Text derives from texere, which means "t...
Aesthetics
Why ‘Cats’ the Movie Fails So Flamboyantly
I can’t seem to get into superhero movie...
Aesthetics
Literacy Debate: Online, R U Really Reading?
A good feature from the New York Times:
...
Books
Rip Van Winkle
Certain it is, that he was a great favor...
Academia
Socrates envisaged a time when we would forget how to remember.
From Daisy Dunn's review of Puchner's Th...
Books
The Visitor #StarTrek #DS9 Rewatch (Season 4, Episode 3) Old Jake Reflects on the life-cha...
Rewatching ST:DS9 On a dark and storm...
Books


