Crichton doesn’t like the idea that someone else is better placed to make judgments than he is. He seems convinced that global warming is largely an invention of careerist scientists abetted by a partisan press.
And he seems to find something smug and stifling, if not dishonest, about consensus: “the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus”, he says. “If it’s consensus, it isn’t science.” —Philip Ball
—Brought to Book (Nature)
A skeptical review of Michael Crighton’s latest book, in which the villians are alarmist environmentalists.
Similar:
Close Reading of Sonnet 130: Form, Theme, and Cultural Context (and a Rage Comic)
I'm preparing to teach Shakespeare again...
Academia
Because Internet: the new linguistics of informal English
I'm planning to begin my online Shakespe...
Culture
To Learn More, This High-Schooler Left The Classroom
Nick Bain, 17, was in class one day when...
Culture
R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) Artistic Prosperity Trailer
We rehearsed and recorded a Zoom recordi...
Art
Canada's Stratford Festival losing 'Shakespeare' from its name
Attending this was one of the handful of...
Culture
Telling Trump’s Story to Children: For Book Publishers, It’s Tricky
This is a challenging writing task. Pres...
Books



See also this review by Michiko Kakutani in the NYT. Ouchie.