Crichton doesn’t like the idea that someone else is better placed to make judgments than he is. He seems convinced that global warming is largely an invention of careerist scientists abetted by a partisan press.
And he seems to find something smug and stifling, if not dishonest, about consensus: “the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus”, he says. “If it’s consensus, it isn’t science.” —Philip Ball
—Brought to Book (Nature)
A skeptical review of Michael Crighton’s latest book, in which the villians are alarmist environmentalists.
Similar:
Gender and Language -- Revisiting Advice I Posted in 1998
When I was in college and active in a Ca...
Culture
Salman Rushdie: how Cervantes and Shakespeare wrote the modern literary rule book
By a set of strange coincidences, compli...
Books
Don't Help Your Kids With Their Homework
Greater parental involvement in school (...
Academia
My 4Cs Story
I chaired a session on Friday, and gave ...
Academia
The ‘Cancelling’ of Flannery O’Connor? It Never Should Have Happened
I regularly teach Flannery O'Connor, and...
Academia
‘Because’ has become a preposition, because grammar
The construction is more versatile than ...
Amusing



See also this review by Michiko Kakutani in the NYT. Ouchie.