“I don’t see why we are fixated on the single category of income as a measure of success,” James R. Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, wrote in an email to The Chronicle. “If humanities majors tend to become teachers, social workers, clergy, does that mean they are less successful than money managers or engineers?
“Instead of assuming these humanities majors are less successful, we ought to be thanking them for being willing to make financial sacrifices in their careers to provide our communities with essential resources,” he wrote. —The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Latest on Napster
(See also: Digital Hollywood- No Resolut...
Current_Events
Boy that feels good.
Academia
Chilling analysis of organized, anonymous disinformation campaign against Parkland survivo...
Forty-seven minutes after news broke of ...
Culture
Sinéad O'Connor's open letter to Miley Cyrus
I was never a fan of Sinéad O'Connor, bu...
Aesthetics
Mom’s Fears About Daughter Leaving For College Channeled Into Fight About Storage Bins
Impatiently scanning store shelves while...
Amusing
Okay yes, this affirmation does matter to me and it will go into my annual review for next...
Marked 832 AP English essays in a week o...
Academia




Jamie Fornsaglio Hull liked this on Facebook.
Karissa Kilgore liked this on Facebook.
I don’t know anyone who sees income as the “single category” of value. But it matters. One also can have a vocation to be financially solvent, to support a family, and to explore new ways of being a humanist in the world.