“I don’t see why we are fixated on the single category of income as a measure of success,” James R. Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, wrote in an email to The Chronicle. “If humanities majors tend to become teachers, social workers, clergy, does that mean they are less successful than money managers or engineers?
“Instead of assuming these humanities majors are less successful, we ought to be thanking them for being willing to make financial sacrifices in their careers to provide our communities with essential resources,” he wrote. —The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Log Off, You Losers! Electronic Flatulence Must Cease!
"Put your hands in your laps. Close your...
Academia
What if thinking is underrated?
What if the most underrated skill in sch...
Academia
Hear That? It’s Your Voice Being Taken for Profit.
Why do tech companies give us these cool...
Business
Selected Negative Teaching Evaluations of Jesus Christ
“Not what I expected. They say his area ...
Academia
Google Books ruled legal in massive win for fair use (updated)
Update in a legal battle that's been goi...
Books
Wonderful Retro Control Panel in Seton Hill University Dining Room
I gather the purpose of these consoles -...
Academia




Jamie Fornsaglio Hull liked this on Facebook.
Karissa Kilgore liked this on Facebook.
I don’t know anyone who sees income as the “single category” of value. But it matters. One also can have a vocation to be financially solvent, to support a family, and to explore new ways of being a humanist in the world.