“I don’t see why we are fixated on the single category of income as a measure of success,” James R. Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, wrote in an email to The Chronicle. “If humanities majors tend to become teachers, social workers, clergy, does that mean they are less successful than money managers or engineers?
“Instead of assuming these humanities majors are less successful, we ought to be thanking them for being willing to make financial sacrifices in their careers to provide our communities with essential resources,” he wrote. —The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
I've spent 8 hours with 24 different Verizon agents who keep transferring me back and fort...
It's not a Verizon Wireless issue. It's ...
Business
Grappling with Genocide: Fostering Empathy and Engagement through Text and Image (NEH fund...
Some of my amazing colleagues have colla...
Culture
"The threat is no longer simply from government censorship."
After using examples from Warsaw and Pra...
Culture
A Note of Recognition for: Filmation's ''Star Trek'' Animators
Even if the animation of Star Trek was l...
Aesthetics
What Is Gamergate, and Why? An Explainer for Non-Geeks
I've been following the frustrating slow...
Current_Events
Tuxedo Pooh Reads Oscar Wilde
I spent an hour on this. Below is the ...
Aesthetics




Jamie Fornsaglio Hull liked this on Facebook.
Karissa Kilgore liked this on Facebook.
I don’t know anyone who sees income as the “single category” of value. But it matters. One also can have a vocation to be financially solvent, to support a family, and to explore new ways of being a humanist in the world.