“I don’t see why we are fixated on the single category of income as a measure of success,” James R. Grossman, executive director of the American Historical Association, wrote in an email to The Chronicle. “If humanities majors tend to become teachers, social workers, clergy, does that mean they are less successful than money managers or engineers?
“Instead of assuming these humanities majors are less successful, we ought to be thanking them for being willing to make financial sacrifices in their careers to provide our communities with essential resources,” he wrote. —The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Carnegie Science Center: Roboworld (and a bit of SportsWorks)
Here's a brief video, made up of clips I...
Culture
Facebook’s push of “related articles” to users without checking credibility draws fire
The links under your friend's post got y...
Cyberculture
Public, Private, Political: Social Theories and Blogging Practices
Public, Private, Political: Social Theor...
Academia
The LA Times deletes tweets that used passive voice, as details emerged about police killi...
Several journalist-involved tweet dele...
Current_Events
Never trust a corporation to do a library’s job
The Internet Archive is mostly known for...
Books
I'm nerdy enough to give my 15yo a used copy of "The Hero with a Thousand Faces."
I'm nerdy enough to give my 15yo a used ...
Books




Jamie Fornsaglio Hull liked this on Facebook.
Karissa Kilgore liked this on Facebook.
I don’t know anyone who sees income as the “single category” of value. But it matters. One also can have a vocation to be financially solvent, to support a family, and to explore new ways of being a humanist in the world.