“Why aren’t American scientists barking? Why do they remain mute?|First, most scientists feel more comfortable in labs and classrooms than on op-ed pages and TV studios
— and they have no real clue about how to go about challenging what they read and see. Second, in virtually 100 percent of cases where scientists have stepped forward to debunk the ‘carcinogen scare de jour,’ they have been subject to ad hominem attacks and labeled “paid liars” for industry. That threat of humiliation is enough to cause many to bite their tongues. Third, science these days has become so very specialized, that the overwhelming portion of our country’s scientists have very narrow areas of expertise. Those with a Ph.D. in entomology, biology, veterinary medicine or physics might possibly be as duped as the average citizen when Mr. Cochran talks about the PCB-induced epidemic in Alabama.” —The Case of the Mute ScientistsAmerican Council on Science and Health)
The Case of the Mute Scientists
I’ve been teaching with this handout for over 25 years, updating it regularly. I just remo...
Sorry, not sorry. I don't want such friends.
Despite its impressive output, generative AI doesn’t have a coherent understanding of the ...
Will Journalism Be a Crime in a Second Trump Administration?
As part of an ongoing feud over the rights to use a particular shade of ultra-black paint,...
A spooooooky post about predatory journals for this Halloween season.