Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Similar:
Why I Left Academe to Become a Science Communicator: The pursuit of academic research was ...
From explaining the effectiveness of soc...
Academia
‘NPR Voice’ Has Taken Over the Airwaves
In literary circles, the practic...
Culture
The Struggle to Save Ballet From Itself
A former dancer reckons with the rigors ...
Aesthetics
Space:1999 design aesthetic merged detailed miniatures with curvy Euro-futurist interior d...
Clearly influenced by Kubrick's 1969 fil...
Aesthetics
Liberal Arts Classes Could Teach Neil deGrasse Tyson a Thing or Two about the Path from Da...
Your mileage may vary, but I immediate...
Books
Defend the Open Web: Keep DRM Out of W3C Standards
The DRM proposals at the W3C exist for a...
Business
Unlike that of most physical and natural scientists, the ability of social scientists to conduct experiments or rely on high-quality data is often limited. In my field, international relations, even the most robust econometric analyses often explain a pathetically small amount of the data’s statistical variance. Indeed, from my first exposure to the philosopher of mathematics Imre Lakatos, I was taught that the goal of social science is falsification. By proving an existing theory wrong, we refine our understanding of what our models can and cannot explain. –Daniel W. Drezner, 

