Before Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy — all the publicity made it sound like nothing but a clever lawyer and a greedy publisher in cahoots to exploit an old woman. Now, having read the book, I glimpse a different tragedy. Lee was a young writer on a roll, with several novels in mind to write after this one. She wrote none of them. Silence, lifelong. I wonder if the reason she never wrote again was because she knew her terrifyingly successful novel was untrue. In taking the easy way, in letting wishful thinking corrupt honest perception, she lost the self-credibility she, an honest woman, needed in order to write. —Book View Cafe Blog
Similar:
Teaching Composition with Interactive Fiction
I'm on a committee that is exploring a m...
Academia
Want a tech job? Study this. Advice from Mozilla, Reddit, Tumblr and more
Students often say they hate group work....
Academia
What’s My Cue? Let’s Talk Shakesepare with Andy Kirtland Virtural #Britsburgh
Culture
Books vs. Kindles: The Choice No One Made Ever
"I bought a Kindle. I didn't immediately...
Books
So this is Pi Day
My wife says she bought the pies intendi...
Amusing
Because words matter, old sport.
Academia




Paul O’Brian liked this on Facebook.
Joanna Howard liked this on Facebook.
Jenny Fox Estok liked this on Facebook.
RT @DennisJerz: Ursula K. Le Guin: Before [Harper Lee’s] Watchman was published, I was skeptical and unhappy … http://t.co/AGZuD3hKFP